I stumbled across a project by right-wing nutters Eagle Forum called Conservapedia, which is billed by its creators as a more honest alternative to the inherent political correctness and liberal bias of Wikipedia. Most of the content consists of stubs featuring poor, if any, research and the type of deep, nuanced understanding of American history one can only glean from a steady diet of Mallard Fillmore cartoons. My favorite entry thus far has to be Judicial Activism:
There are two major types of judicial activism practiced in the United States' court system:Let's move temporarily beyond the obvious "only 'liberal' judges are capable of activism" canard and take a look at one of the examples cited: Brown v. Board of Education. Following Conservapedia logic, Brown v. Board is guilty of the first type of judicial activism, striking down a law that upholds core conservative American values. In ruling that segregating public school students violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, Brown struck down Plessy v. Ferguson, that trademark espousal of a core conservative American value: racism.
1. Liberal judges striking down laws that uphold core conservative American values
2. Liberal judges refusing to strike down laws that subvert core conservative American values
As for the "Liberal judges" part, Brown v. Board was one of the Warren Court's trademark cases. It was also a unanimous ruling. Not to single out the Superchief here, but Earl Warren served three terms as the Republican Governor of California, strongly supported Japanese internment during World War II, and was Dewey's Vice-Presidential candidate when he lost to Truman in 1948. The most liberal decision he oversaw gave us the Miranda warning.
Thus, according to Conservapedia, our newfound bastion of light and truth, Earl Warren was a liberal pansy and America was properly racist until he fucked it all up.
Conservapedia, why do you hate America?



